
19 Jun 2009
Hackmeeting Warm Up 2009
By Daniele Salvini on 19 Jun 2009, 02:30 - video
[en] Hackmeeting will
be preceded by a Warmup period: a cycle of meetings regarding *p2p*, *fear* and
*control* that will take place in the main universities of Milan.
[it] Hackmeeting sarà preceduto da un periodo di Warm up: una serie di incontri su *p2p*, *paura* e *controllo* che si terranno nei principali poli universitari della città.
[it] Hackmeeting sarà preceduto da un periodo di Warm up: una serie di incontri su *p2p*, *paura* e *controllo* che si terranno nei principali poli universitari della città.
15 Jun 2009
W Union Square
By Daniele Salvini on 15 Jun 2009, 19:02 - events

E' stato presentato all'Arcipelago Film Festival a Roma: W Union Square, un documentario di Enzo Aronica al quale abbiamo collaborato.
7TH INTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL OF SHORT FILMS AND NEW IMAGES
NATIONAL SHORT FILMS COMPETITION
CON/CORTO
ITALIA, ITALY, 2009 - DOCUMENTARIO/DOCUMENTARY
BETACAM SP, COL./B&N, DOLBY STEREO - 27’
W UNION SQUARE
di Enzo Aronica
SCENEGGIATURA/SCRIPT: E. Aronica, Riccardo Barbera
FOTOGRAFIA/CINEMATOGRAPHER: E. Aronica, Daniele Salvini
MONTAGGIO/EDITOR, EFFETTI
VISIVI/VISUAL EFFECTS, ANIMAZIONE/ANIMATION, PRODUTTORE/PRODUCER: E.
Aronica
SUONO/SOUND: E. Aronica, Daniele Salvini, Marina Catucci
PRODUZIONE/PRODUCTION: Trio Alma Mahler
CAST: Massimo Popolizio, Roberto Herlitzka
È il racconto di un’attesa, consumata in una delle piazze più antiche di Manhattan, nei giorni immediatamente successivi all’11 Settembre. La risposta intima di una grande metropoli, ferita come mai prima, sospesa tra lacrime e vendetta.
Arcipelago Film Festival, Intrastevere Multiscreen, Roma
Domenica 14 Giugno 2009 ore 22:30
Lunedì 15 Giugno 2009 ore 20:00

Serate bastarde Compagnia Dionisi 2009
By Daniele Salvini on 15 Jun 2009, 03:32 - video
The Theatre piece "Serate bastarde" from the Compagnia teatrale Dionisi at Piccolo Teatro Milano June 9th 2009, interview with the authors and actresses Renata Ciaravino, Silvia Gallerano and Carmen Pellegrinelli and Company manager Alessandra Maculan
12 Jun 2009
an article for nova sole24ore, june 11th 2009
By Daniele Salvini on 12 Jun 2009, 12:41 - articles
[en] an article for Nova del
Sole24ore, june 11th 2009 [click for a better reading]
[it] un articolo per Nova del Sole24ore, 11 giugno 2009 [clicca per leggere meglio]
l'articolo in forma integrale
[it] Karl Fogel e Nina Paley fanno notare una aggiunta importante: Nina deve comunque pagare i possessori del copyright per l'utilizzo delle canzoni (le composizioni)! Qui è spiegato in dettaglio: Dunque il film è liberamente licenziato online. Chiunque può farne una distribuzione commerciale e scegliere o meno di condividere i guadagni con Nina Paley -- esiste questa libertà. Ma non hanno comunque scelta nel pagare o meno i monopolisti che "posseggono" queste canzoni di 80 anni fa: perché ogni DVD venduto commercialmente sia legale, il possessore del copyright deve essere pagato. Dopo molti sforzi e molte spese, Nina ha finalmente raggiunto un negoziato coi proprietari. A questa pagina ci sono i dettagli.
[it] un articolo per Nova del Sole24ore, 11 giugno 2009 [clicca per leggere meglio]
l'articolo in forma integrale
update, june 22th 2009
[en] Karl Fogel and Nina Paley are pointing out an important additional
fact: Nina still had to pay the copyright owners for the rights to use the
songs (the compositions)! This is described in detail here: So the movie
is freely licensed online. Anyone can make a commercial distribution and choose
whether or not to share revenues with Nina Paley -- that is their freedom. But
they have no choice about paying the monopolists who "own" these 80-year-old
songs: for each commercial DVD sold to be completely legal, the copyright
owners must be paid. Nina did finally (after much effort and expense) negotiate
the owners down. The final figures are given at the above web
page.
[it] Karl Fogel e Nina Paley fanno notare una aggiunta importante: Nina deve comunque pagare i possessori del copyright per l'utilizzo delle canzoni (le composizioni)! Qui è spiegato in dettaglio: Dunque il film è liberamente licenziato online. Chiunque può farne una distribuzione commerciale e scegliere o meno di condividere i guadagni con Nina Paley -- esiste questa libertà. Ma non hanno comunque scelta nel pagare o meno i monopolisti che "posseggono" queste canzoni di 80 anni fa: perché ogni DVD venduto commercialmente sia legale, il possessore del copyright deve essere pagato. Dopo molti sforzi e molte spese, Nina ha finalmente raggiunto un negoziato coi proprietari. A questa pagina ci sono i dettagli.
following the english translation of the article:
The main inspiration of the director Nina Paley is the contamination among
different styles and cultures. Freedom of the author. The Creative Commons
license is adopted to escape from the cage of copyright. By Daniele
Salvini
Cheaper videocameras and portable video-editing systems: today it is
easier for a movie's author to be his own producer. Even if the systems for the
distribution are changing, (but) still the intermediaries between the artist
and the audience are strong and they are able to inhibit the distribution of a
work containing parts of past works. This is the case of the animation movie
"Sita sings the Blues", realized in 5 years by the independent artist Nina
Paley. The film is a pop musical work derived from the epic sacred text of
Ramayana, telling the tragic romance between the gods Hindu Sita and Rama. Nina
finds correspondences with her own love story and transforms the ancient
tragedy into a coloured modern comedy on the background choreographic sound of
the blues songs of the Twenties by Annette Hanshaw; a touching story of love
and justice and the shout of a woman claiming equal rights. Nina found herself
negotiating the use of blues songs of year 1929 with record industry majors,
that asked 20,000 $ for each song; then she decided to release the movie with
Creative Commons license, arguing that majors acted as bad parasites, that
prefer to let the work, whose rights they own, die, instead of being satisfied
of royalties proportioned to possibilities and the goals of the requester.
Today, most of the common cultural elements are confined by un-ruled entites,
having no cultural goals and no reference to the people who created these
works. In USA the copyright was born with the goal to give the author a
temporary monopoly on his own work, along the lasting of his working life, to
encourage him to produce again; this is quite different from today's copyright,
that extends up to 95 years without stimulating anything. The archetype of the
protected cultural element is our common childhood friend, Mickey Mouse. The
expiring of the right of the author coincides with its copyright, that every 20
years is prolonged of twenty years (last update was on 1998) and has passed the
life of his author, so representing an abuse of copyright. Nina cares to
underline that her choose was motivated by the desire to keep far from her work
"Those oppressing, censuring and monopolistic hands; I choose a CC-Share-Alike
license that will avoid forever to my work to be imprisoned by copyright". This
case shows how an alternate artistic production system is growing, that
enriches the dimension of Commons even allowing some retribution to the author:
"I have chosen this license because it applies well to cultural works, I did
not impose any commercial restriction, everyone is free to make money by
selling contents from the film, this difference is important, you can sell DVDs
containing the film. The content is the culture, containers are objects that
can be sold, and people will pay more with pleasure when knowing that they are
directly paying the artist." The artists, most of them, not the few talented
stars that are carried as an example by the distributors, always depended by
different sources of money: commissions, teaching, salaries and patronage. The
copyright system does not carry any advantage to the artists, but to the
industry that in fact defends its own privileges, calling them "rights", and
showing the sad face of the artist to inspire sympathy. The English coach
builders, at the coming of cars, imposed a law requiring that each car would
have a person sit in the front, having the job to ring a bell and ask for
permission, with the aim to delay the diffusion of their competitors, the cars,
and increase their cost. A different distribution system, whether called p2p
economy or decentralized payment system, will be possible thanks to the net,
that allows a direct exchange among people, without the need of any
intermediary. Nina thinks that an education is needed to contrast the
pro-copyright campaign of the big media: "Like that claiming 'download is the
same as stealing' that is simply false! Copyright was designed by distributors
to help themselves, not the artists. I would like that the true story of
copyright were known, together with questioncopyright.org I am preparing a
project named Minute Memes, many animated short films on the artistic freedoms
and the restrictions of copyright". www.sitasingstheblues.com
[thanks to Truman for the english translation]
6 Jun 2009
Open Roads 2009
By Daniele Salvini on 6 Jun 2009, 12:44 - video
Open Roads, rassegna of the New Italian Cinema
New York at the Lincoln Center, 4-11 June 2009.
an Interview in italian with director Dino Gentili (I am alive - Sono viva).
« previous entries - page 2 of 9 - next entries »
